Truth 1: All Men are Men
Yay Tautology! But anyways, the three principles behind this are:
- A Man’s self declaration makes him a Man.
- A Man’s thoughts, feelings, words and deeds are always Manly.
- Therefore, a Man is always a Man.
What does it exactly mean to declare oneself as a man? And if a self declaration makes him a man, then he was not one before this declaration. Therefore, a man could not self declare himself a man since he was not one beforehand. Also, the second statement: "A Man’s thoughts, feelings, words and deeds are always Manly," I find incredibly wrong. I do not hold the belief that all actions or thoughts have a gendered connotation. Compassion is neither male or female, hitting a baseball is not masculine or feminine, and there is nothing gendered about sleeping, showering, eating, so on and so forth.
Although I wholeheartedly disagree with the second principle, The first principle might still be salvaged? Perhaps what This philosophy was trying to state is that when a man self declares himself as a man, it means to say that when a biological male identifies himself with and takes pride in his masculinity, he becomes an 'ideal' version of a man. I think this would be a slightly more defensible version of the principles. I still find problems with it, but it is much more clear. If anyone has any more ideas on making this idea more defensible or wants to critique this, feel free.
If the second principle is not a tautology, it's tendentious, presuming at best a dubious conception of manliness.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I have always refused to "be a man," and felt the expectation to do so as a form of brutality.
But for the most interesting articulation of this ideal, check out the poet Robert Bly's "Iron John."
I was looking at some of the links on the page you linked to, and I will probably be commenting on one of them in my blog. It seems like the idea of masculinism is mostly a response to radical feminism, but I'll go into more on my blog.
ReplyDeleteIt seems to me, the debates here on the blogs keep on turning back to men. I thought we were going to focus on women's issues in this course?
ReplyDeleteI would say that it is because one cannot discuss the genders without talking about the others. The reason I am talking about this brand of masculinism is because this type was formed in response to radical feminism.
ReplyDelete